Fatal Error Padlock Sha
It did about a week ago, so now I am running kernel 184.108.40.206-217.2.3.fc11.i586, but the error is still there: Code: modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/220.127.116.11-217.2.3.fc11.i586/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko): No such device So, does Thanks in advance. I see modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/2.6.38-11-generic/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko): No such device during boot up. Edit bug mail Other bug subscribers Subscribe someone else Bug attachments AcpiTables.txt (edit) AlsaDevices.txt (edit) BootDmesg.txt (edit) Card0.Amixer.values.txt (edit) Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt (edit) Card0.Codecs.codec.1.txt (edit) CurrentDmesg.txt (edit) IwConfig.txt (edit) Lspci.txt (edit) Lsusb.txt (edit) http://hprank.net/fatal-error/fatal-error-inserting-padlock-sha.html
Changing Version to Fedora 11. Offline Pages: 1 Index »Kernel & Hardware »padlock-sha Board footer Jump to Newbie Corner Installation Kernel & Hardware Applications & Desktop Environments Laptop Issues Networking, Server, and Protection Multimedia and Games Fedora 11 is > no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further > security or bug fix updates. Sorry for the bad wording. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519456
Alternatively, you can probably tell the system not to attempt to load that module. My thoughts at the moment are that the volume was encrypted by aes, so the padlock-sha.ko was not necessary to mount the volume. Here it is a regular Fedora system, not live media. Jul 4 13:31:54 localhost modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/2.6.32.lustre23/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko): No such device Jul 4 13:31:59 localhost kernel: LNet: Added LNI [email protected] [8/256/0/180] Jul 4 13:31:59 localhost kernel: LNet: Accept secure,
So the problem might be because of the difference between normal mkinitrd and /usr/libexec/mkliveinitrd in combination with the modules listed in the /etc/sysconfig/mkinitrd created by /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/imgcreate/live.py The problem could (in principle) Comment 12 Chris Underhill 2009-12-15 17:49:52 EST I have the same problem on an up-to-date regular F11 i686 VMWare image. /home was set up as encrypted when I performed the installation, Comment 16 Bug Zapper 2010-06-28 10:18:54 EDT Fedora 11 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-06-25. The files /etc/ipsec.d/private/sslkey.pem are different in each box.
Comment 11 Mads Kiilerich 2009-10-13 10:04:31 EDT I still see it on my custom livecd with kernel-18.104.22.168-64.fc11.i586 Removing "need-info". lambengolmor (nicola-feltrin) wrote on 2011-06-11: #4 I have this problem too. The problem is dicussed and apprently solved on http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464673 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cryptsetup-luks-1.0.6-7.fc11.i586 kernel-PAE-22.214.171.124-32.fc11.i686 Comment 1 Milan Broz 2009-08-26 13:26:09 EDT That message comes from kernel cryptoAPI The messages come up because you don't have hardware support for encryption. >>Jul 4 13:31:54 localhost modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/2.6.32.lustre23/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko): No such device I don`t know who use sha
May be this relate to distro problem. If this fatal message confuse, you can blacklist padlock-sha module. AplayDevices: **** List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices **** card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: AD198x Analog [AD198x Analog] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 Architecture: amd64 ArecordDevices: **** List of Activity All Comments History Activity Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order Hide Permalink Alexander Boyko added a comment - 06/Jul/12 2:24 AM - edited >>there is about a
What makes up $17,500 cost to outfit a U.S. this contact form Opts: (null) and later many of these : May 9 21:02:05 schambrin-laptop kernel: [ 66.786117] Valid eCryptfs headers not found in file header region or xattr region May 9 21:02:05 schambrin-laptop Respectfully, Jose A. My encrypted partitions (luks, ext4) still open and are accessible.
modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/126.96.36.199-191.fc11.i586/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko): No such device See similar errors reported on ubuntu forums... System: 11.04 64 bit, crypted home directory. _felix_ (fnoz) wrote on 2011-06-12: #6 Ok, forget my comment for this issue. Home | New | Search | [?] | Reports | Requests | Help | NewAccount | Log In [x] | Forgot Password Login: [x] | Report Bugzilla Bug Legal Home Forums have a peek here I spent an hour looking for the problem before realizing it was a Fedora 11 problem...
Oct 4 14:08:56 stroustrup kernel: Initializing XFRM netlink socket Oct 4 14:08:56 stroustrup ipsec_setup: NETKEY on eth0 192.168.112.71/255.255.255.0 broadcast 255.255.255.0 Oct 4 14:08:57 stroustrup ipsec_setup: ...Openswan IPsec started Oct 4 14:08:57 Oct 4 12:09:04 berglek modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/2.6.21-2-686/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko): No such device Oct 4 12:09:04 berglek kernel: padlock: VIA PadLock Hash Engine not detected. I understood most of the suggestion except "--enablerepo=u*g" What did that flag do?
Projecting raster z-values from foot to meters?
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. See full activity log To post a comment you must log in. I am using 2.6.38-11-generic and /home and swap encryption. Comment 9 skiffx 2009-09-19 14:47:43 EDT I get the same error, on up-to-date FC11, when using cryptsetup for the first time.
Wind mills in empty fields. However I got the error at boot like the OP got: modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/188.8.131.52-85.fc13.x86_64/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko): No such device Notice that it's the 2.6.33-3 kernel with F13. F.12 dmi.board.name: 30E1 dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.board.version: KBC Version 03.24 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: CND8512TL6 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvr68PSUVer.F.12:bd05/28/2010:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPEliteBook2530p(FU431EA#AB9):pvrF.12:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn30E1:rvrKBCVersion03.24:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct10:cvr: dmi.product.name: HP EliteBook 2530p (FU431EA#AB9) dmi.product.version: F.12 dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard See original description Tags: apport-collected Check This Out Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version
Priority:-1 extents:1 across:4194296k Jun 28 07:04:29 localhost kernel: QEMU Accelerator Module version 1.4.0, Copyright (c) 2005-2008 Fabrice Bellard SNIP my /etc/crypttab cswap /dev/mapper/vg_system-lv_swap /dev/urandom swap,cipher=aes-cbc-essiv:sha256 and my /var/log/boot snipplet SNIP Remounting From a terminal window please run: apport-collect 779912 and then change the status of the bug back to 'New'. Jun 28 07:04:29 localhost kernel: Adding 4194296k swap on /dev/mapper/cswap. Configurando o Gerenciamento de Volumes Lógicos: 3 logical volume(s) in volume group "VolGroup00" now active ^[[60G[^[[0;32m OK ^[[0;39m]^M Verificando sistemas de arquivos /dev/mapper/luks-42593326-2028-449b-94e2-7a7d61f68701: clean, 971754/2632672 files, 8437918/10526215 blocks /dev/sda1: clean, 44/25896
share|improve this answer answered Sep 4 '14 at 12:31 HBruijn 4,0831019 Added my commands, maybe the way I load modules is not correct? –Ask and Learn Sep 5 '14 At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '11'. I eventually found out I had to restart the network every single time i made a configuration change for the full effect of the change to work. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the
Jun 28 07:04:29 localhost kernel: padlock: VIA PadLock Hash Engine not detected. This bug appears to have been introduced by LU-1201. Browse other questions tagged linux filesystems dm-crypt or ask your own question. If you insmod only libcfs.ko no padlock-sha.ko error at dmesg log for my SL6.1.
Changed in linux (Ubuntu): status: New → Incomplete Joao Mendes (badseed-pt) wrote on 2011-07-19: AcpiTables.txt #8 AcpiTables.txt Edit (516.5 KiB, text/plain) apport information tags: added: apport-collected natty running-unity description: updated Joao I have even tryed:blacklist padlock_aesblacklist padlock_shaHowever i get no more error in my log.So im guessing it worked.I went to whatismyip.comAnd my ip is still my normal ip. here is what I did echo "modprobe dm_crypt" > /etc/sysconfig/modules/load_dm_crypt.modules cryptsetup luksFormat /dev/vg01/lv_crypt cryptsetup luksUUID /dev/vg01/lv_crypt cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/vg01/lv_crypt lv_crypt mkfs -t ext4 /dev/mapper/lv_crypt cat /etc/crypttab [[email protected] ~]# cat /etc/crypttab lv_crypt Oct 4 12:09:04 berglek modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/2.6.21-2-686/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko): No such device Oct 4 12:09:04 berglek kernel: padlock: No VIA PadLock drivers have been loaded.
AFAICS there is no open questions - except "does anybody know what is going on". Also we are using IB for Lnet. Mark as duplicate Convert to a question Link a related branch Link to CVE You are not directly subscribed to this bug's notifications. Nov 18 07:03:35 st61 modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting padlock_sha (/lib/modules/2.6.32-358.18.1.el6_lustre.x86_64/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko): No such device Nov 18 07:03:39 st61 kernel: Lustre: Lustre: Build Version: 2.4.1-RC2--PRISTINE-2.6.32-358.18.1.el6_lustre.x86_64 This happens when we are loading Lustre on
Pfft. When I enter "modprobe lnet-selftest", there is about a 10 second pause before the load completes. May 9 21:01:31 schambrin-laptop kernel: [ 16.565269] padlock_aes: VIA PadLock not detected.